Abstract
The article deals with the problem of implementation in practice of effective forensic research atthe stages of identifying and solving crimes of a corruption orientation, and, in this connection, therole of the prosecutor's office is defined. The practice of the use of tactical operations as an integrated tactical tool for identifying and disclosing bribery is analyzed. It is proposed to amend the criminal procedural law in part of the exclusion of the stage of initiation of criminal proceedings. The author draws attention to the presence of obstacles to the implementation of a tactical operation, which can only be carried out after the initiation of a criminal case. This line of research is complemented by a consideration of the problem of participation of the prosecutors office in protecting individuals from unlawful criminal prosecution, which was a consequence of mistakes that were made when authorities engaged in investigative activities found to cooperate with citizens in relation to which an operational check was previously conducted.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
