Abstract

Purpose: This study delves into the intricate legal dimensions surrounding criminal liability pertaining to the unauthorized provision of explosive materials, highlighting the critical issue of individuals and entities engaging in such activities without the necessary licenses or permits. It comprehensively explores the legal frameworks governing the acquisition, possession, and distribution of explosive materials, meticulously dissecting the potential criminal consequences within these complex regulations. Theoretical Framework: The theoretical framework of this research revolves around the analysis of relevant statutes and case law governing the acquisition, possession, and distribution of explosive materials. By examining the legal foundations that underpin these regulations, the study seeks to uncover the theoretical underpinnings that guide the criminal liability for providers operating without proper licenses. Method: This research adopts both normative juridical and empirical juridical approaches. The normative juridical aspect involves a theoretical examination of legal principles, doctrines, and regulations related to criminal acts involving unauthorized possession and control of explosives. Result: The research shown that the criminal liability of those involved in unauthorized possession and use of explosives in Decision Number 1075/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Tjk is legally proven and punishable. Originality/Value: This research makes a significant contribution to existing knowledge by offering an in-depth investigation into the legal repercussions faced by individuals and entities involved in the unauthorized provision of explosive materials. The originality of this study lies in its comprehensive analysis of legal frameworks, providing a nuanced understanding of criminal liability in this specific context.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call