Criminal Liability against Distracting Offenders Fiduciary Guarantee

Abstract

This This research aims to find out whether there are cases in criminal cases that violate Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees, so that readers can find out about the regulation of fiduciary guarantees in terms of Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees. And so that you can find out about the criminal liability of renting out goods that are the object of fiduciary collateral without written permission from the fiduciary recipient. And also so that it can be a lesson for all of us. And also the results of research files pekara I meticulously and from several sources or literary I read. Sehububungan with the use of the juridical normative research type, then approach the problem using an approach case case approach. Statutory approach used by the research because this research focuses on the study of norms in a rule of law especially those associated directly with the fiduciary guarantee legislation. The use of case approach in this research aims to study the application of legal rules or norms that are done in the practice of law. In such cases it is clear that in the docket which I read was already plain to see that the perpetrators are found guilty and has been deliberately doing acts that violate the Law Number 42 in 1999 about the Fiduciary Guarantee. And also the results of this research confirms the fiduciary banned Givers turn, mortgaged, or meyewakan to any other objects into the object fiduciary guarantee that cannot be an inventory object, except with the consent of the recipient of the first tertukis fiduciary. as stipulated in article 36 Jo Article 23 paragraph (2) of ACT No. 42 of 1999 RI about the Fiduciary Guarantee. It is intended, in order to give legal certainty to the fiduciary guarantee.