Criminal Justice Discretion as a Regulatory System

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessCriminal Justice Discretion as a Regulatory SystemStephen J. SchulhoferStephen J. Schulhofer Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Legal Studies Volume 17, Number 1Jan., 1988 Sponsored by The University of Chicago Law School Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/468121 Views: 40Total views on this site Citations: 31Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1988 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Carla Sepulveda, Javier Wilenmann Structuring prosecutorial power, Legal Studies 119 (Apr 2022): 1–16.https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2022.14Anne Metz, John Monahan, Luke Siebert, Brandon Garrett Valid or voodoo? A qualitative study of attorney perceptions of risk assessment in sentencing and plea bargaining, Journal of Community Psychology 48, no.66 (Jul 2020): 2053–2068.https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22404Alexander Lundberg Leniency Can Increase Deterrence, International Review of Law and Economics 60 (Dec 2019): 105862.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2019.105862Thomas J. Miceli Plea Bargaining: Negotiated Justice, (Nov 2019): 97–117.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31695-2_5 References, (Jan 2019): 453–702.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804417-9.16001-6Alexander Lundberg When Do the Innocent Plead Guilty?, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2018).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3100845Matthew DeMichele, Peter Baumgartner, Kelle Barrick, Megan Comfort, Samuel Scaggs, Shilpi Misra What Do Criminal Justice Professionals Think About Risk Assessment at Pretrial?, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2018).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3168490Brian D. Johnson, Ryan D. King, Cassia Spohn Sociolegal Approaches to the Study of Guilty Pleas and Prosecution, Annual Review of Law and Social Science 12, no.11 (Oct 2016): 479–495.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-084755Jennifer Arlen Prosecuting Beyond the Rule of Law: Corporate Mandates Imposed through Deferred Prosecution Agreements, Journal of Legal Analysis 8, no.11 (Jun 2016): 191–234.https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/law007Alexander Lundberg Sentencing discretion and burdens of proof, International Review of Law and Economics 46 (Jun 2016): 34–42.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2015.12.002Alexander Libman, André Schultz, Thomas Graeber Tax Return as a Political Statement, Review of Law & Economics 0, no.00 (Jan 2016).https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2014-0017Lee Ellis, Anthony W. Hoskin The evolutionary neuroandrogenic theory of criminal behavior expanded, Aggression and Violent Behavior 24 (Sep 2015): 61–74.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.05.002Duol Kim, Iljoong Kim Trade-offs in the allocation of prosecution resources: an opportunity cost of overcriminalization, Applied Economics 47, no.1616 (Jan 2015): 1652–1669.https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2014.1000531Alex Lundberg Sentencing Discretion and Burdens of Proof, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2015).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2578661Timo Goeschl, Ole Jürgens Criminalizing environmental offences: when the prosecutor’s helping hand hurts, European Journal of Law and Economics 37, no.22 (Aug 2011): 199–219.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-011-9270-7N. Garoupa, M. Rizzolli The Brady Rule May Hurt the Innocent, American Law and Economics Review 13, no.11 (Feb 2011): 168–200.https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahq018Amy Dellinger Page True Colors: Police Officers and Rape Myth Acceptance, Feminist Criminology 5, no.44 (Oct 2010): 315–334.https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085110384108Lydie Ancelot, Myriam Doriat-Duban Analyse économique du plaider coupable, Revue économique 61, no.22 (Jan 2010): 237.https://doi.org/10.3917/reco.612.0237Sanford C. Gordon, Gregory A. Huber The Political Economy of Prosecution, Annual Review of Law and Social Science 5, no.11 (Dec 2009): 135–156.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.131458THOMAS J. MICELI CRIMINAL SENTENCING GUIDELINES AND JUDICIAL DISCRETION, Contemporary Economic Policy 26, no.22 (Apr 2008): 207–215.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.2007.00065.xAmy Dellinger Page Behind the Blue Line: Investigating Police Officers’ Attitudes Toward Rape, Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology 22, no.11 (Jul 2007): 22–32.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-007-9002-7Nuno M. Garoupa, Matteo Rizzolli Why Pro-Defendant Criminal Procedure Might Hurt the Innocent, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2007).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1068622Oren Bar-Gill and Oren Gazal Ayal Plea Bargains Only for the Guilty Bar‐Gill/Gazal, The Journal of Law and Economics 49, no.11 (Jul 2015): 353–364.https://doi.org/10.1086/501084Ronald F. Wright, Marc L. Miller The Screening/Bargaining Tradeoff, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2002).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.325580Edward L. Glaeser, Daniel P. Kessler, Anne Morrison Piehl What Do Prosecutors Maximize? An Analysis of the Federalization of Drug Crimes, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2000).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.196528Alissa Pollitz Worden Representing the Accused: Professional Values and Professional Choices of Small-Town Lawyers, Criminal Justice Review 23, no.11 (Sep 2016): 1–28.https://doi.org/10.1177/073401689802300102Luigi A. Franzoni Negotiated Enforcement and Credible Deterrence, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 1998).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.87712Thomas J. Miceli Plea bargaining and deterrence: An institutional approach, European Journal of Law and Economics 3, no.33 (Sep 1996): 249–264.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00709142J.Langley Miller, John J. Sloan A study of criminal justice discretion, Journal of Criminal Justice 22, no.22 (Jan 1994): 107–123.https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(94)90107-4Stephen J. Schulhofer A Wake-Up Call from the Plea-Bargaining Trenches, Law <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Social Inquiry 19, no.11 (Jan 1994): 135–144.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1994.tb00393.xJohn R. Lott DO WE PUNISH HIGH INCOME CRIMINALS TOO HEAVILY?, Economic Inquiry 30, no.44 (Oct 1992): 583–608.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1992.tb01283.x