Abstract
ABSTRACTThis article explores the relationship between criminal justice and historical master narratives about the communist past in post-1989 Bulgaria and Germany. It focuses on the legal and historical debates that have unfolded within the Bulgarian Revival Process trial and the trial of the National Defence Council of the former German Democratic Republic. Previous literature on transitional justice has argued that trials of former authoritarian officials have an important epistemic function for societies in transition, because they challenge and overturn the dominant historical accounts about the dictatorial regime. In contrast, this article shows how in two different post-communist cases the outcomes of trials had been influenced by entrenched master narratives about the ousted political order. Criminal justice thus played a limited role in providing new readings of the dictatorial past.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
