Crestal bone loss and periimplant inflammatory parameters around zirconia implants: A systematic review

Abstract

Statement of problemZirconia implants have been used for oral rehabilitation; however, evidence of their ability to maintain crestal bone and periimplant soft tissue health is not clear. PurposeThe purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate crestal bone loss (CBL) around zirconia dental implants and clinical periimplant inflammatory parameters. Material and methodsThe focus question addressed was, “Do zirconia implants maintain crestal bone levels and periimplant soft tissue health?” Databases were searched for articles from 1977 through September 2014 with different combinations of the following MeSH terms: “dental implants,” “zirconium,” “alveolar bone loss,” “periodontal attachment loss,” “periodontal pocket,” “periodontal index.” Letters to the editor, case reports, commentaries, review articles, and articles published in languages other than English were excluded. ResultsThirteen clinical studies were included. In 8 of the studies, the CBL around zirconia implants was comparable between baseline and follow-up. In the other 5 studies, the CBL around zirconia implants was significantly higher at follow-up. Among the studies that used titanium implants as controls, 2 studies showed significantly higher CBL around zirconia implants, and in 1 study, the CBL around zirconia and titanium implants was comparable. The reported implant survival rates for zirconia implants ranged between 67.6% and 100%. Eleven studies selectively reported the periimplant inflammatory parameters. ConclusionsBecause of the variations in study design and methodology, it was difficult to reach a consensus regarding the efficacy of zirconia implants in maintaining crestal bone levels and periimplant soft tissue health.