Abstract
The representation of women is often used as a critical touchstone for the re-assessment of many medieval texts: this is also true of discussions of Robert Henryson’s The Testament of Cresseid and Gavin Douglas’s Eneados. This essay compares these poems’ representation of female figures, specifically Cresseid and Dido, but also others, both mortal and immortal. It reflects briefly on the differences between the Scottish poems and their Chaucerian models, Troilus and Criseyde, The House of Fame, and The Legend of Good Women and considers in more depth the frames provided for their narrative of women’s experience. Finally, it explores the provision of speech to female figures, and the relationship between women’s voices, and their agency and experience, and the masculine frames of judgement in which they are set. The essay concludes by suggesting that having a voice may be considered as a proxy for moral agency, and brings culpability in its wake.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
