Abstract
Although the vibro-replacement stone column technique is being deployed increasingly in soft cohesive soil deposits in which creep settlements may be significant/dominant, the majority of existing stone column settlement design methods are either non-specific or pertain to primary settlement only. Consequently, in the absence of further guidance, designers sometimes apply the same settlement improvement factor to creep settlements that they have estimated for primary settlements. In this paper, Plaxis 2D finite-element analyses carried out in conjunction with the elasto-viscoplastic soft soil creep model have indicated that settlement improvement factors are lower when creep is considered and therefore the design of stone columns ignoring creep is unconservative. These analyses were used to establish the impact of a range of relevant variables on ‘primary’, ‘total’ and ‘creep’ settlement improvement factors, leading to the development of a simplified empirical approach for predicting creep settlement improvement factors for use in conjunction with an existing primary settlement design method.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Ground Improvement
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.