Creek systems in restored coastal wetlands: Morphological evolution and design implications

Abstract

Saltmarsh restoration such as managed realignment (MR) projects often include excavation of simplified tidal creek networks to improve drainage and marsh functioning, but their design is based on limited evidence. This paper compares the morphological evolution of creek networks in current MR projects in the UK with creek networks in natural saltmarshes, in order to provide improved guidance.The evolution of creek networks was monitored for 2–20 years post-breach at 10 MR sites across the UK by semi-automatically extracting 12 morphological creek parameters from lidar. The rates of creek evolution in MR sites are linked to the initial tidal, morphological and sedimentological conditions using principal component analysis, then compared with power law relationships of morphological equilibrium defined from 13 mature natural saltmarshes.MR creeks evolved into larger, more complex, better distributed systems, with a total creek length and volume statistically similar to their natural counterparts. However, the creek volume remains poorly distributed, with a mean distance between creeks ranging from 33 to 101 m versus 5–15 m for natural mature saltmarshes. MR creeks are also clustered around the breach area, leaving the marsh interior poorly drained. MR creek network morphologies remain strongly influenced by the initial creek template, as evidenced by unnaturally straight creeks inherited from former drainage ditches.A combination of external conditions (i.e., tidal range, sediment concentration in the wider estuary) and local conditions (i.e., site elevation, topographical heterogeneity, soil compaction) controls how easily creeks can form within MR sites. This in turn determines the amount of engineering effort required to help achieve reference site conditions. The end goal of creek design is to create MR sites that closely resemble reference site conditions, however the final design is also likely to be affected by a range of practical factors (e.g. engineering/cost) unique to each site and project.