Abstract

The paper shows that Hong Kong’s currency board in recent years has gone through three stages, a rule-bound regime, a regime based on discretion, and a return to fixed rules. A number of methods developed in the target zone literature have been used to measure the credibility of the system. The empirical results show that the currency board was most credible when the monetary authority adhered to fixed rules. Reliance on discretion contributed not only to the erosion of market confidence in the system, but also made speculative currency attacks during the Asian financial turmoil easier. (a) City University of Hong Kong; (b) Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. *Paper prepared for presentation at the tenth annual East Asian Seminar on Economics to be held in Hawaii on June 9-12, 1999. We are indebted to Alex Chan, K.C. Chan, YukShee Chan, Nai-fu Chen, and Merton Miller for useful discussions and comments. All remaining errors are ours. Financial support from the Research Grant Council of Hong Kong, under grant number HKUST6217/97H, is gratefully acknowledged.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.