Abstract

Studies of creativity emerging from cultural psychology and social psychology perspectives challenge individualist conceptions of creativity to argue that social interaction, communication, and collaboration are key elements in creativity. In recent work creative collaboration has been proposed to be “distributed” between audiences, materials, embodied actions, and the historico-socio-cultural affordances of the creative activity and environment, thus expanding the potentialities of creative collaboration beyond instances of direct human interaction and engagement. Music performance, improvisation and composition may be viewed as exemplary “laboratories” of creative collaboration through the combined elements of audiences, materials, embodied actions and historico-socio-cultural affordances and constraints. This article reports the findings of a systematic literature review of creative collaboration and collaborative creativity in music. We sought to identify what has been currently investigated in relation to these terms and concepts in music, with what methodologies and in what settings. Findings indicate that studies were undertaken in higher education, professional development and professional practice predominantly, leading to an emergent phenomenon of interest, collaborative creative learning. Musical genres were jazz, popular, western classical, contemporary and world musics across the musical processes of composing, improvising and performing. Studies in higher education and professional development settings focused on identifying those practices that supported learning rather than the nature of collaborative creative approaches or the outcomes of creative collaboration. Participants were primarily male, with small sample sizes. Methodologies were largely qualitative with an emphasis on case study using observation, interview and reflective diary methods. Further areas for research include: the investigation of gendered approaches to creative collaboration, collaborative creativity, and collaborative creative learning; the use of more diverse research methodologies and methods and techniques including large-scale quantitative studies and arts-based and arts-led approaches; and the investigation of more diverse music settings.

Highlights

  • Studies of creativity emerging from cultural psychology (Glaveanu, 2010a,b; Barrett et al, 2014; Glaveanu et al, 2014) and social psychology theoretical frameworks (Miell and Littleton, 2004; MacDonald et al, 2005) increasingly challenge individualist conceptions of creativity to argue that social interaction, communication, and collaboration are key elements in creative thought and practice

  • We suggest that music performance, improvisation and composition may be viewed as exemplary “laboratories” of creative collaboration and/or collaborative creativity through the historico-socio-cultural affordances they offer and the combined elements of audiences, materials, embodied actions and the collaborative teams that are involved

  • The findings presented above illustrate that eminence investigations of creative collaboration and collaborative creativity have been undertaken within a range of settings in higher education, professional development and professional music-making with a more limited focus on these concepts within research carried out in community music settings

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Studies of creativity emerging from cultural psychology (Glaveanu, 2010a,b; Barrett et al, 2014; Glaveanu et al, 2014) and social psychology theoretical frameworks (Miell and Littleton, 2004; MacDonald et al, 2005) increasingly challenge individualist conceptions of creativity to argue that social interaction, communication, and collaboration are key elements in creative thought and practice. Vera John -Steiner’s seminal work Creative Collaboration published in 2000 identifies a number of contributing factors for the turn from an individualist Western focus on the solitary creative genius to a social constructivist view of creativity. Whilst nested in the notion of familial relationships (e.g., life-partners), focus on the ways in which relationships, roles and responsibilities may shift between members over time and between tasks These collaborations rely on a heightened sense of mutual obligation, shared companionship, and belonging, as well as a capacity to survive or manage productively the tensions, conflicts, and disagreements that might arise through collaborative work. John-Steiner’s fourth pattern of collaboration, integrative collaboration is created in and built upon joint endeavors to effect “transformative change.” She emphasizes that these four patterns of creative collaboration are not hierarchical; rather, they serve different ends in producing creative work

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call