Abstract

We explored people’s views regarding the kind of relationship that can be expected and created using such websites. In the current study, we used the same scenario technique. Vignettes depicting the kind of relationship an individual expected to find through the use of an online dating service were created by orthogonal combination of five factors: (a) passion; that is, the level of personal, affective involvement in the relationship, (b) intimacy; that is, the type of relationship desired (friendship vs. intimate/sexual), (c) commitment; that is, the expected duration of the relationship (short term vs. long term), (d) the user’s gender, and (e) the user’s age. Three contrasted positions were found. A minority of participants considered that creating a relationship using dating services was never very easy. A plurality of participants considered that creating either long-term romantic relationships or short-term, more “utilitarian” relationships was considerably easier than creating either short-term romantic relationships or long-term, more “utilitarian” relationships. Another plurality of participants considered that creating any relationship was quite possible. These participants disconnected the commonly admitted association between the duration of a relationship and level of emotional involvement. In other words, they considered that creating a passionate but short-lived relationship was not more difficult than creating any other kind of relationships.

Highlights

  • IntroductionWe explored people’s views regarding the kind of relationship that can be expected and created using such websites

  • The present study explored people’s views regarding the kind of relationship that can be expected and created using such websites

  • An ANOVA was conducted on the whole set of data with a design of Cluster x Gender x Age x Type of relationship x Duration x Sentiments, 4 x 2 x 3 x 2 x 2 x 3

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We explored people’s views regarding the kind of relationship that can be expected and created using such websites. Vignettes depicting the kind of relationship an individual expected to find through the use of an online dating service were created by orthogonal combination of five factors: (a) passion; that is, the level of personal, affective involvement in the relationship, (b) intimacy; that is, the type of relationship desired (friendship vs intimate/sexual), (c) commitment; that is, the expected duration of the relationship (short term vs long term), (d) the user’s gender, and (e) the user’s age. Combinations of levels of these dimensions can, in Sternberg’s view, define most kinds of relationships: (a) consummate love (passion in association with intimacy and commitment), (b) romantic love (passion in association with intimacy), (c) fatuous love (passion associated with commitment), (d) infatuated love (passion alone), (e) enduring friendship/ companionate love (intimacy associated with commitment), (f) occasional friendship (intimacy), (g) collaboration/companionship (commitment), and (h) ordinary relationship (no passion, no intimacy and no commitment). These eight kinds of relationships may be exemplified by concepts such as husband/ wife, lover, flame, coup de foudre, a long-time friend, acquaintance, colleague/collaborator, and neighbor

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call