Creating and Validating Practical Measures for Assessing Public Health Practices in Local Communities

Abstract

Efforts to develop a surveillance system to measure local public health performance were initiated in 1991. The organizing framework for the proposed system consisted of three core functions formulated by the Institute of Medicine and linked with 10 practices previously defined. A surveillance protocol was developed using local public health jurisdictions rather than specific agencies within the jurisdictions, as the units of study. Selection of 84 indicators was assisted by follow-up study of a group of departments analyzed in 1979 and by review of recent public health literature. Each of the 84 performance indicators was linked to one of the 10 practices. Responses to the survey were obtained from local health department directors. Results yielded scores for the surveyed jurisdiction with regard to adequacy of performance for each practice, the proportional contribution to performance by the local health department, and the identification of other providers contributing to the coverage of each practice within the jurisdiction. A shortened version of the protocol (26 indicators) was tested in all local jurisdictions in six states and shown to correlate reliably with scores obtained from the longer protocol for overall public health performance, as well as for performance of each of the three core functions and for some of the 10 practices. A subset of four indicators was shown to predict reliably the overall score. The findings support the proposition that public health practice can be defined, measured, and monitored and that current widely accepted definitions of core functions and practices have utility. Measurement and surveillance tools for these functions and practices are available and tested.