Abstract

After the advent of the first free and fair elections in South Africa in 1994, access to municipal services became a right for all residents. Now, more than ever, the inclusion of previously disadvantaged communities is being intensified. However, the delivery of services often remains inadequate, eliciting increasing protests throughout the country. Protests, which are often the last resort by communities, are indicative of declining levels of trust in local government. It becomes problematic when trust in communication channels and public participation strategies is limited, co-production of services is impeded and the possibility of increasing such trust is, in turn, negatively affected. This study used a mixed-methods approach including both quantitative and qualitative research techniques to validate the posed research questions and authenticate the presented problem statement. The triangulation approach allowed for effectively engaging the strengths of both research methodologies. The findings of the study revealed that as a result of communities’ increasing lack of trust and confidence in local government, service delivery protests are increasing. The study further indicated that communities in the Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality (NMBM) are generally not well informed about the development plans of the municipality and do not adequately participate in local government activities. The study provides recommendations to augment trust in local government communication channels to improve public participation that could lead to the co-production of services. In this way, the study asserts that trust can be enhanced in what amounts to a virtuous cycle.

Highlights

  • Post-1994, access to municipal services in South Africa was no longer regarded as a privilege meted out to communities based on race, but rather as the right of all residents

  • The empirical component of this study restricted its geographical focus to the Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality (NMBM), which has a population of 1 263 051, as reported in the 2016 Community Survey (Stats SA 2016)

  • The qualitative data were generated from focus group interviews with 23 NMBM ward committee members, whereby useful insights relating to trust, and citizen and public participation were obtained using questions extracted from an interview schedule

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Post-1994, access to municipal services in South Africa was no longer regarded as a privilege meted out to communities based on race, but rather as the right of all residents. The National Policy Framework on Public Participation views public participation as the democratic process of engaging people in decisions that affect their communities, and which allows citizens to be active role-players in the development and management of services that affect their lives (Department of Provincial and Local Government 2005:1) Whilst such aforementioned policies promote cooperation, elected public representatives have largely not been successful in bringing about visible and fundamental changes in their relations with the public and institutions of governance at the local sphere (Jakoet-Salie 2018:60). Shaidi (2013:279) states that it is clear that communities have lost trust in the engagement process with their government and that public participation, as legislated, works below anticipated optimal levels In this regard, Shaidi (2013:279) contends that the citizens have chosen their own way of talking to the government, namely, via violent service delivery protests to show their dissatisfaction. Certain communities still feel isolated and disengaged from decision-making processes and feel disempowered in terms of their capacity to influence the affairs of their local municipality

Findings of the empirical study
COͳPRODUCTION
Conclusion
Data availability statement
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call