Abstract

Currently, increasingly large medical imaging data sets become available for research and are analysed by a range of algorithms segmenting anatomical structures automatically and interactively. While they provide segmentations on a much larger scale than possible to achieve with expert annotators, they are typically less accurate than experts. We present and compare approaches to estimate segmentations on large imaging data sets based on a small number of expert annotated examples, and algorithmic segmentations on a much larger data set. Results demonstrate that combining algorithmic segmentations is reliably outperforming the average individual algorithm. Furthermore, injecting organ specific reliability assessments of algorithms based on expert annotations improves accuracy compared to standard label fusion algorithms. The proposed methods are particularly relevant in putting the results of large image analysis algorithm benchmarks to long-term use.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.