Abstract

To prove that diagnostic algorithm based on additional measurement of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) for administration of systemic antibacterial therapy (ABT) to patients with suspected community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and concomitant chronic heart failure (CHF) does not influence outcomes of disease. This open, single-center, randomized, prospective, noninferiority study included 160 adult patients with documented functional class II-IV CHF who had been admitted with a preliminary diagnosis of non-severe CAP. Patients were randomized at 1:1 to two groups; group 1 - with additional measurement of CRP (n=80) and group 2 - with the use of routine diagnostic methods (n=80). In group 1, systemic ABT was administered only when serum CRP was >28.5 mg / l (threshold level of the biomarker calculated at the previous stage of the study); group 2 received a standard treatment. Noninferiority test result for both algorithms was evaluated by the number of patients with clinical success on days 12-14 (primary endpoint). Non-inferiority margin was δ=-13.5 %. In addition secondary endpoints (early clinical response on days 3-5; early in-hospital adverse events (development of complications; admission to intensive care unit (ICU); death), death, recurrent CAP or CHF worsening with readmission at 28 day; mortality at 90 and 180 days) were estimated. Standard statistical tools were used for all intergroup comparisons. 76 patients of each group reached the primary endpoint. Systemic ABT was administered to 51 (67.1 %) patients in group 1 and 76 (100 %) patients in group 2 (p<0.05). Both groups were comparable (p>0.05) regarding all endpoints: clinical success, 70 (92.1 %) vs. 69 (90.8 %), Δ=1.3 % (one-sided 97.5 % CI: - 8.25 % for non-inferiority margin δ=-13.5 %); early clinical response, 66 (86.8 %) vs. 68 (89.5 %); admission to ICU, 1 (1.3 %) vs. 1 (1.3 %); development of complications, 20 (26.3 %) vs. 22 (28.9 %); readmission, 5 (6.6 %) vs. 6 (7.9 %); in-hospital mortality, 2 (2.6 %) vs. 1 (1.3 %), mortality at 28 day, 3 (3.9 %) vs. 2 (2.6 %), at 90 day, 5 (6.6 %) vs. 4 (5.3 %), at 180 day, 8 (10.5 %) vs. 9 (11.8 %) cases, respectively. additional measurement of serum CRP in patients with CHF and suspected non-severe CAP was able to reduce rate of systemic ABT administration without outcomes and prognosis worsening.

Highlights

  • Включение в стандартный алгоритм обследования пациентов с предположительным диагнозом внебольничной пневмонии (ВП) определения различных сывороточных биомаркеров воспаления (С-реактивный белок (С-РБ), прокальцитонин, цитокины) позволяет существенно повысить эффективность диагностических моделей, основанных на рутинных клинических, рентгенологических и лабораторных методах [4, 5]

  • prove that diagnostic algorithm based on additional measurement of serum C-reactive protein

  • IV chronic heart failure (CHF) who had been admitted with a preliminary diagnosis of non-severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP)

Read more

Summary

Summary

Systemic ABT was administered to 51 (67.1 %) patients in group 1 and 76 (100 %) patients in group 2 (p0.05) regarding all endpoints: clinical success, 70 (92.1 %) vs 69 (90.8 %), Δ=1.3 % (one-sided 97.5 % CI: – 8.25 % for non-inferiority margin δ=–13.5 %); early clinical response, 66 (86.8 %) vs 68 (89.5 %); admission to ICU, 1 (1.3 %) vs 1 (1.3 %); development of complications, 20 (26.3 %) vs 22 (28.9 %); readmission, 5 (6.6 %) vs 6 (7.9 %); in-hospital mortality, 2 (2.6 %) vs 1 (1.3 %), mortality at 28 day, 3 (3.9 %) vs 2 (2.6 %), at 90 day, 5 (6.6 %) vs 4 (5.3 %), at 180 day, 8 (10.5 %) vs 9 (11.8 %) cases, respectively. Цель исследования: доказать, что алгоритм назначения системной АБТ у пациентов с предполагаемой ВП и сопутствующей ХСН, основанный на дополнительном определении уровня С-РБ в сыворотке крови, не влияет на исходы заболевания. При этом для демонстрации не меньшей эффективности необходимо было сохранить как минимум 85 % эффекта стандартного алгоритма. Все статистические тесты проводились для двусторонней гипотезы на уровне значимости 0,05 (различия считались достоверными при р

Результаты В исследование последовательно было включено
Findings
Сопутствующие заболевания
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.