Abstract
Prior studies on the consequences of executive dismissal following a performance failure on investor reactions are contradictory. However, the literature has been silent on whether and how the actual responsibilities of the dismissed executives studied could influence investor reactions. Drawing on signaling theory and role theory, we examine how CEO dismissal and CFO dismissal following a stock price crash might be differentially perceived by investors as distinct executive roles. We propose that the fit between a dismissed executive’s role (CEO versus CFO) as a signal of blame, and the specific circumstances surrounding a stock price crash failure, will be fundamental in shaping investor reactions. We find support for our theorizing across two studies. Study 1 is an archival study of U.S. firms spanning the period 1992—2014 that comprised 29,242 firm-year observations. Study 2 is an experiment that conceptually replicates our first study to address causality concerns using two samples: 820 participants with investment experience and 297 professional investors. Our findings indicate that executive role, and the fit between role and circumstances of failure, are important considerations when using executive dismissal to restore investor confidence.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
