Abstract

Archaeological dog remains from many areas clearly show that these animals suffered tooth fractures, tooth loss, trauma, and dental defects during their lives. Relatively little research has explored the meanings of these patterns, particularly for ancient dog remains from small-scale societies of the North. One limiting issue is the lack of comparative data on dental health and experiences of trauma among northern wolves and dogs. This paper examines tooth loss, tooth fracture, enamel hypoplasia, and cranial trauma in a large sample of historic dog and wolf remains from North America and Northern Russia. The data indicate that the dogs more commonly experienced tooth loss and tooth fracture than the wolves, despite reportedly being fed mostly soft foods such as blubber and fish. The higher rates observed in the dogs likely is a result of food stress and self-provisioning through scavenging. The ability to self-provision was likely important for the long-term history of dog use in the north. Dogs also more commonly experienced cranial fractures than wolves, particularly depression fractures on their frontal bones, which were likely the result of blows from humans. Hypoplastic lesions are rare in both wolves and dogs, and probably result from multiple causes, including food stress, disease, and trauma.

Highlights

  • Remains of dogs from across the globe show that these animals experienced traumatic injuries, tooth loss, and disease during their lifetimes

  • It is often difficult to ascertain if rates of fracture, tooth loss, or dental defects in archaeological dog remains differ from those observed in local wild canids

  • Antemortem tooth loss Several overarching patterns are apparent in the AMTL data

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Remains of dogs from across the globe show that these animals experienced traumatic injuries, tooth loss, and disease during their lifetimes. One of the clear limiting factors in interpreting signs of trauma and pathology on the skeletons of northern dogs is a lack of comparative skeletal or documentary data. It is often difficult to ascertain if rates of fracture, tooth loss, or dental defects in archaeological dog remains differ from those observed in local wild canids. Biologists and paleontologists have generated some useful comparative canid trauma and disease data [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19], but such studies often focus on single highly specific patterns such as tooth fracture, limiting the breadth of their usefulness for archaeological interpretation. To move the study of ancient dog life histories forward, more detailed comparative studies are needed

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call