Abstract
Crack width (CW) and crack spacing (CS) data from full-scale continuously reinforced concrete pavement (CRCP) test sections were collected and analyzed for this study. In order to compare CWs obtained under different temperature conditions, the CRCP CW model presented in the new mechanistic–empirical pavement design guide (MEPDG) was utilized to standardize the measurements. The MEPDG CS model was compared first to the measured data due to its direct link to CW prediction. Based on the measured material properties, pavement geometry, and climatic conditions, the predicted CS and the CS distribution matched the observations on the three main CRCP sections. Using the same inputs provided in the CS prediction, the CW model in the MEPDG significantly over predicted the measured CW. The CW model was calibrated with the measured data in order to compare CWs between sections acquired at various temperature conditions. At the standard temperature condition, the measured CW varied from 0.031 to 0.116 mm and was smaller for higher reinforcement ratios. The CW formula was modified to allow computation of CW at any slab depth. A study of CW variability in one test section showed a skewed distribution with a right tail.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.