Abstract

AbstractSmall repeating earthquakes are thought to represent rupture of isolated asperities loaded by surrounding creep. The observed scaling between recurrence interval and seismic moment, Tr∼M1/6, contrasts with expectation assuming constant stress drop and no aseismic slip (Tr∼M1/3). Here we demonstrate that simple crack models of velocity‐weakening asperities in a velocity‐strengthening fault predict the M1/6 scaling; however, the mechanism depends on asperity radius, R. For small asperities ( , where is the nucleation radius) numerical simulations with rate‐state friction show interseismic creep penetrating inward from the edge, and earthquakes nucleate in the center and rupture the entire asperity. Creep penetration accounts for ∼25% of the slip budget, the nucleation phase takes up a larger fraction of slip. Stress drop increases with increasing R; the lack of self‐similarity being due to the finite nucleation dimension. For simulations exhibit simple cycles with ruptures nucleating from the edge. Asperities with exhibit complex cycles of partial and full ruptures. Here Tr is explained by an energy criterion: full rupture requires that the energy release rate everywhere on the asperity at least equals the fracture energy, leading to the scaling Tr∼M1/6. Remarkably, in spite of the variability in behavior with source dimension, the scaling of Tr with stress drop Δτ, nucleation length and creep rate vpl is the same across all regimes: . This supports the use of repeating earthquakes as creepmeters and provides a physical interpretation for the scaling observed in nature.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call