Abstract
ABSTRACT The CPTPP aims to achieve deep economic integration through substantive regulations. However, it falls short due to its de-institutionalized inter-state DSM and its dependence on the WTO DSM, which following the AB crisis is currently impaired. The question is whether structural and procedural revisions are needed within the CPTPP and WTO DSMs to effectively resolve current and future disputes. To answer this, the article conducts a comparative analysis of the two DSMs. It emphasizes the importance of aligning the WTO DSM with transformational deep agreements and establishing multilateral pillars for dispute settlement that recognize the ambitions of modern trade agreements.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
