Abstract

BackgroundCpf1 nucleases have recently been repurposed for site-specific genome modification. Two members of the Cpf1 family, the AsCpf1 from Acidaminococcus sp. and the LbCpf1 from Lachnospiraceae bacterium were shown to induce higher indel frequencies than SpCas9 when examining four randomly-selected target sequences for each type of nuclease. Whether they are a real match for Cas9 nucleases, however, remains to be verified.ResultsHere, we used AsCpf1 and LbCpf1 to induce homology directed repair, either single strand annealing (SSA) or homologous recombination (HR), in N2a mouse neuroblastoma cells. Exploiting a plasmid that contains two GFP halves with overlapping sequences and exploring 20 targets, on all but one both nucleases consistently performed with above 10 % efficiency. Several Cas9 nucleases have been previously characterised in order to find an orthogonal counterpart for the most widely used promiscuous SpCas9. Here, we found that AsCpf1 and LbCpf1 might be better candidates than three of the best such counterparts: Cas9 from Staphylococcus aureus, from Streptococcus thermophilus and from Neisseria meningitidis, when assessed for inducing efficient SSA mediated repair in N2a cells. When tested on genomic targets exploiting HR, both nucleases were able to induce the integration of a donor cassette with 1000 bp-long homologous arms. We also generated plasmids that express these Cpf1 nucleases together with their cognate crRNAs and that are equipped with type IIS restriction enzyme sites to facilitate spacer cloning.ConclusionsOur results suggest that employing As- or LbCpf1 nuclease to induce homology directed repair in N2a cells, although is less effective at present than employing SpCas9, it is an equally or more effective tool than the most frequently used orthogonal Cas9 counterparts of SpCas9. These findings support the position of Cpf1 nucleases on the side of SpCas9 on the palette of effective genome engineering tools.ReviewersThis article was reviewed by Eugene Koonin, Haruhiko Siomi and Jean-Yves Masson.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13062-016-0147-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) from Prevotella and Francisella 1 (Cpf1) nucleases have recently been repurposed for site-specific genome modification

  • These findings support the position of CRISPR from Prevotella and Francisella 1 (Cpf1) nucleases on the side of SpCas9 on the palette of effective genome engineering tools

  • In order to monitor the activity of Acidaminococcus sp. BV3L6 Cpf1 (AsCpf1) and Lachnospiraceae bacterium ND2006 Cpf1 (LbCpf1) nucleases we employed a fluorescence reporter assay using an interrupted-Green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression cassette in a plasmid where the two fragments (GFP “halves”) of the GFP sequence are separated in a way to contain an overlapping 480 base-pairs long region (Additional file 1) [31]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cpf nucleases have recently been repurposed for site-specific genome modification. The LbCpf from Lachnospiraceae bacterium were shown to induce higher indel frequencies than SpCas when examining four randomly-selected target sequences for each type of nuclease. Whether they are a real match for Cas nucleases, remains to be verified. The adaptation modules that acquire and deposit appropriate sequence motifs from the invading agent to specific locations called CRISPR arrays of the microbial genome, consist of two proteins: Cas and Cas2 [9]. The PAM is recognized by the protein’s PAMbinding domain and its sequence may differ for Cas proteins from different species [22, 23]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call