Abstract

Objective: C-peptide has been the most technically appropriate and theoretically reasonable substitute for β-cell activity. In equimolar concentration, insulin and C-peptide are co-secreted into the portal circulation. Methods: A total of 150 participants of diagnosed diabetes mellitus (DM) and 18–45 years aged were studied. Those diabetics were classified into three groups supported by fasting serum C-peptide (FC) level and low FC cluster comprised participants with FC level <0.6 ng/ml. Intermediate FC group comprised subject with FC level >0.6–1.8 ng/ml and high FC group comprised participants with FC >1.8 ng/ml. Results: The cutoff set of C-peptide was taken as 0.3–2.45 ng/ml. The prevalent diabetes among males was 85%–65% female. For the 150 diabetic participants, 18 (12%) were classified as type 1 DM (T1DM), 77 (51.3%) with type 2 DM, and the rest 55 (36.7%) as latent autoimmune diabetes in adults or MODY were perceived. In participants with T1DM, the mean serum C-peptide was slightly lower than in other diabetes forms. Considering the family history of diabetics in our research, detectable C-peptide in people with the family experience of diabetes was identified. Family diabetes history presence was seen in 15.5% of type 1 DM T1DM cases, while 84.5% of the remainder of the cases. Such classification is focused solely on family records and C-peptide rates which are subject to antibody screening, a genetic study for improved identification of the forms of diabetes. Conclusions: This result indicates that the diabetes measure C-peptide should be used in scientifically linked diabetes diagnosis, diabetes period, and subject age for appropriately managing persons with diabetes.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.