Abstract
When a hard real-time transaction conflicts with some un-hard real-time transactions, the traditional concurrency control protocols make the hard real-time transaction prior obtain system resources through enhancing its priority and preemption. They ignore how to deal with confliction between some hard real-time transactions. This paper aims at resolving this problem. It proposes a concurrency control protocol CPaHR. One hard real-time transaction includes some alternatives, an alternative describes one execution routine. Any alternative success means the hard real-time transaction can commit, otherwise. If new hard real-time transaction conflicts with some alternatives of running hard real-time transaction, it aborts these alternatives but the transactions. Our experiment shows that CPaHR can improve success-ratio of hard real-time transactions obviously.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
