Abstract

ObjectiveTo create an aerosol containment mask (ACM) for common otolaryngologic endoscopic procedures that also provides nanoparticle-level protection to patients.Study DesignProspective feasibility study .SettingIn-person testing with a novel ACM.MethodsThe mask was designed in Solidworks and 3D printed. Measurements were made on 10 healthy volunteers who wore the ACM while reading the Rainbow Passage repeatedly and performing a forced cough or sneeze at 5-second intervals over 1 minute with an endoscope in place.ResultsThere was a large variation in the number of aerosol particles generated among the volunteers. Only the sneeze task showed a significant increase compared with normal breathing in the 0.3-µm particle size when compared with a 1-tailed t test (P = .013). Both the 0.5-µm and 2.5-µm particle sizes showed significant increases for all tasks, while the 2 largest particle sizes, 5 and 10 µm, showed no significant increase (both P < .01). With the suction off, 3 of 30 events (2 sneeze events and 1 cough event) had increases in particle counts, both inside and outside the mask. With the suction on, 2 of 30 events had an increase in particle counts outside the mask without a corresponding increase in particle counts inside the mask. Therefore, these fluctuations in particle counts were determined to be due to random fluctuation in room particle levels.ConclusionACM will accommodate rigid and flexible endoscopes plus instruments and may prevent the leakage of patient-generated aerosols, thus avoiding contamination of the room and protecting health care workers from airborne contagions.Level of evidence2

Highlights

  • Measurements were made on 10 healthy volunteers who wore the aerosol containment mask (ACM) while reading the Rainbow Passage repeatedly and performing a forced cough or sneeze at 5second intervals over 1 minute with an endoscope in place

  • The sneeze task showed a significant increase compared with normal breathing in the 0.3-mm particle size when compared with a 1-tailed t test (P = .013)

  • We made statistical comparisons between the distribution of raw sensor particle counts during normal breathing compared with 3 tasks: reading of the Rainbow Passage, forced cough, and forced sneeze with suction on and off (n = 60)

Read more

Summary

Methods

The mask was designed in Solidworks and 3D printed. The study was approved by the University of Southern California Institutional Review Board (IRB: HS-20-00482). The mask was designed by the authors and created using Solidworks (Dassault Systemes, Paris, France) and printed using a 3D printer (Ultimaker, Utrecht, The Netherlands) using tough polylactic acid. The final design included a 3D-printed body with 4 ports, a gel cushion for seal and comfort of fit, and custom blind grommets placed in 2 front ports plus a head strap (Figure 1). All materials were cleaned in Cidex OPA (Advanced Sterilization Products, Irvine, California). An N95-level commercially available respirator filter can be attached to any of the 3 front ports and replaced between patients. A suction is attached to the suction port of the mask from a commercially available suction pump

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call