Abstract

Widespread school closures occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. Because closures are costly and damaging, many jurisdictions have since reopened schools with control measures in place. Early evidence indicated that schools were low risk and children were unlikely to be very infectious, but it is becoming clear that children and youth can acquire and transmit COVID-19 in school settings and that transmission clusters and outbreaks can be large. We describe the contrasting literature on school transmission, and argue that the apparent discrepancy can be reconciled by heterogeneity, or "overdispersion" in transmission, with many exposures yielding little to no risk of onward transmission, but some unfortunate exposures causing sizeable onward transmission. In addition, respiratory viral loads are as high in children and youth as in adults, pre- and asymptomatic transmission occur, and the possibility of aerosol transmission has been established. We use a stochastic individual-based model to find the implications of these combined observations for cluster sizes and control measures. We consider both individual and environment/activity contributions to the transmission rate, as both are known to contribute to variability in transmission. We find that even small heterogeneities in these contributions result in highly variable transmission cluster sizes in the classroom setting, with clusters ranging from 1 to 20 individuals in a class of 25. None of the mitigation protocols we modeled, initiated by a positive test in a symptomatic individual, are able to prevent large transmission clusters unless the transmission rate is low (in which case large clusters do not occur in any case). Among the measures we modeled, only rapid universal monitoring (for example by regular, onsite, pooled testing) accomplished this prevention. We suggest approaches and the rationale for mitigating these larger clusters, even if they are expected to be rare.

Highlights

  • Because school closures are costly and damaging to students, schools were later reopened despite the risk of contact among students contributing

  • Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2, a newly emerged respiratory virus

  • A range of approaches to mitigating transmission in schools, in the context of circulating COVID-19 in the broader community, are being deployed as schools reopen for the fall and winter in many areas

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2, a newly emerged respiratory virus. Many jurisdictions implemented widespread distancing measures including school closures, and partly as a result, despite the pandemic’s global reach with over 40M cases worldwide [3] at the time of writing, there remains considerable uncertainty about the role of children and of schools in the transmission of COVID-19. Schools are a safe haven and safety net for children at risk of, or experiencing, domestic abuse, and the impacts of these are severe in both short and long terms [9]. It is crucial to understand how much and by what route transmission occurs in the classroom environment, both so we can (i) accurately weigh the costs of school opening in terms of COVID-19 transmission against the immense social costs of school closure, (ii) determine which interventions are most effective in limiting transmission in the classroom environment

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call