Abstract

We develop an epidemionomic model that jointly analyzes the health and economic responses to the COVID-19 crisis and to the related containment and public health policy measures implemented in Luxembourg and in the Greater Region. The model has a weekly structure and covers the whole year 2020. With a limited number of parameters, the model is calibrated to depict the pre-crisis evolution of the Luxembourg economy, and to match post-lockdown leading economic indicators and industry-specific infection curves. The nowcasting part of our analysis reveals that each week of lockdown reduces national output by about 28% (and annual GDP by 0.54%). A first peak of the infection curve was observed at the very beginning of April. If the lockdown measures had been permanent, annual GDP would have decreased by 22% in 2020, the number of COVID-19 cases would have reached zero around mid-June, and the proportion of recovered people would have reached 1.4% of the population. In an economy heavily relying on skill-intensive services, we show that the role of teleworking has been instrumental to limiting the weekly economic output loss (almost by one half) and the propagation of the virus. In the forecasting part of the analysis, we quantify the epidemiological and economic responses to gradual deconfinement measures under various public health scenarios. If the post-lockdown transmission rates could be kept constant throughout the deconfinement period, restarting all sectors would have huge effects on the economy (limiting the annual GDP loss to about 7%) and no effect on the aggregate infection curve. While it is a good time for lifting containment measures, there is also a risk that increasing the density of employees at the workplace and resuming social activities would induce a rebound in the infection curve. Preventing such a relapse is possible with PCR testing of both national and cross-border workers, and with accompanying measures such as (i) maintaining teleworking practices, (ii) reopening hotels, restaurants and cafes at half of their full capacity or with equivalent physical distancing measures and last but not least, (iii) sustaining distancing measures in social activities. Overall, in our worst-case scenario, combining bi-monthly testing with contact tracing and quarantining measures appear to be a sufficient (perhaps not necessary) policy option in the aftermath of the deconfinement plan.

Highlights

  • The COVID-19 pandemic has affected people’s health and economic indicators all around the globe

  • We argued that bringing teleworkers back to the workplace and, perhaps more importantly, the resumption of social life were likely to generate a rebound in the infection curve

  • In an optimistic scenario, depicted by the dashed black curve, we assume that (i) masks, distancing and hygiene measures are maintained and allow to keep transmission rates at 50% of their prelockdown levels in all industries, (ii) post-lockdown teleworking prac­ tices remain in force in all sectors, and (iii) the resumption of social life has no effect on transmission rates outside the labor market and schools

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected people’s health and economic indicators all around the globe. Focusing on Luxembourg’s economy and workers from neighboring regions (representing about one half of Lux­ embourg’s labor force), we develop an epidemionomic model that com­ bines an extended Input–Output economic block with a multi-sector SIR epidemiological block, and use it to analyze the public health and eco­ nomic effects of the COVID-19 crisis week after week throughout the years 2020 and 2021. Lockdown and social distancing measures were necessary to flatten the infection curve and avoid a collapse of the health care system, at the cost of generating sizeable cuts in economic output.. Our epidemiological block accounts for the spread of the virus outside the workplace in addition to differential infection rates of cross-border workers, a speci­ ficity of the Luxembourgish labor market.

An epidemionomic model for Luxembourg
Economic structure
Epidemiological structure
Epidemionomic interdependencies
Parameterization
Results
Back to May 2020: managing the first deconfinement
Back to October 2020: managing the second wave
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.