Abstract

The competition between honeycomb and hexagonal tiling of molecular units can lead to large honeycomb superstructures on surfaces. Such superstructures exhibit pores that may be used as 2D templates for functional guest molecules. Honeycomb superstructures of molecules that comprise a C3 symmetric platform on Au(111) and Ag(111) surfaces are presented. The superstructures cover nearly mesoscopic areas with unit cells containing up to 3000 molecules, more than an order of magnitude larger than previously reported. The unit cell size may be controlled by the coverage. A fairly general model was developed to describe the energetics of honeycomb superstructures built from C 3 symmetric units. Based on three parameters that characterize two competing bonding arrangements, the model is consistent with the present experimental data and also reproduces various published results. The model identifies the relevant driving force, mostly related to geometric aspects, of the pattern formation.

Highlights

  • Molecular self-assembly on substrates may be used to fabricate desired nanostructures on surfaces

  • A fairly general model was developed to describe the energetics of honeycomb superstructures built from C3 symmetric units

  • Often weak interactions are used such as hydrogen bonding, dispersion forces, p–p stacking, metal coordination, and electrostatic interactions.[2,3,4,5]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Molecular self-assembly on substrates may be used to fabricate desired nanostructures on surfaces. The assembly process is initiated and controlled by the molecule–substrate and molecule–molecule interactions. The former interaction ideally ensures the stable adsorption of the molecules and their efficient diffusion on the surface at suitable temperatures.[1] The molecule–molecule interactions usually determine the self-assembled molecular patterns. Often weak interactions are used such as hydrogen bonding, dispersion forces, p–p stacking, metal coordination, and electrostatic interactions.[2,3,4,5] Local, directional, and selective molecule– molecule interactions, for example, hydrogen bonding and metal coordination, are attractive because they enable further control of the patterns via suitable design of molecules.[6]

Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.