Abstract

ABSTRACT Clinical supervision is a common practice in youth mental health services; however, research that characterizes the extent to which routine supervision aligns with gold standard supervision described in research trials is largely unknown. Community supervisors and supervisees reported on 100 supervision sessions; a subset (n = 57) were analyzed using observational coding. Results indicated that coverage of evidence-based practice elements was brief and some elements were rarely discussed (e.g., exposure for anxiety). Participants also reported discussion of practice elements outside of research-supported protocols (e.g., therapeutic alliance). Findings highlight differences between supervision in controlled research and supervision in routine settings.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call