Abstract

ABSTRACT The Multiple Mapping Conditioning (MMC) model for sparse Lagrangian Large-Eddy Simulations (LES) is coupled with tabulated chemistry based on reaction-diffusion manifolds (REDIM). In addition to assessing the reduction in computational cost compared to direct integration on the fly, a comparison with the previously implemented REDIM solver based on the Eulerian Stochastic Fields (ESF) is performed. The methane/air Sandia flames D and E are selected as a benchmark, which are amenable to a 2D REDIM database having a passive scalar and one progress variable as dimensions. A comparison between direct integration ESF and MMC shows that the latter gives better predictions of the conditional means and fluctuations, offering at the same time a significantly reduced computational cost. When coupled with REDIM, MMC and ESF models provide similar results, indicating the significant sensitivity of the predictions to the thermochemical states which are restricted to the same REDIM manifold. When the states are projected back onto the REDIM surface in the direction where the progress variables remain almost constant, accuracy is lost in the cold fuel-lean region with MMC. Furthermore, the computational performance gain in MMC compared to ESF is reduced when the REDIM tabulation is used, pointing to non-chemistry related computational bottlenecks in the MMC algorithms.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.