Abstract

Local and national surveys consistently point to two weaknesses in undergraduate engineering education: our graduates have poor communication and interpersonal skills, and they have poor computing skills. The former inhibits students from taking active roles in team-oriented projects and presenting the results, while the latter limits their ability to analyze and solve complex problems. However for various reasons, undergraduate civil engineering education has been slow to respond to these needs. Rather, we tend to hold on to the same learning paradigm that has educated engineers for the last several decades; namely, passive classroom lectures, individual homework assignments, and problem-solving exams. Group activities, if they are included at all, tend to be simplistic and ill-supervised. In select courses in our department at the University of Oklahoma, we are beginning to address these weaknesses via classroom reform. The paradigm centers on project-driven assignments, by which we mean students an organized into teams and given a complex design question at the beginning of the semester before any substantive background material is delivered. In the remainder of the semester (or portion thereof if several tasks an to be assigned), class activities, be they short lectures or class discussions or group exercises, are driven by student questions on how to complete the project.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call