Abstract

Reflectance spectra provide integrative measures of plant phenotypes by capturing chemical, morphological, anatomical and architectural trait information. Here, we investigate the linkages between plant spectral variation, and spectral and resource-use complementarity that contribute to ecosystem productivity. In both a forest and prairie grassland diversity experiment, we delineated n-dimensional hypervolumes using wavelength bands of reflectance spectra to test the association between the spectral space occupied by individual plants and their growth, as well as between the spectral space occupied by plant communities and ecosystem productivity. We show that the spectral space occupied by individuals increased with their growth, and the spectral space occupied by plant communities increased with ecosystem productivity. Furthermore, ecosystem productivity was better explained by inter-individual spectral complementarity than by the large spectral space occupied by productive individuals. Our results indicate that spectral hypervolumes of plants can reflect ecological strategies that shape community composition and ecosystem function, and that spectral complementarity can reveal resource-use complementarity.

Highlights

  • Plants partition resources in space and time as a result of contrasting ecological strategies and evolutionary histories, giving rise to biochemical, structural or phenological differences that determine the optical properties of leaves and canopies

  • We reduced the dimensionality of spectral data by using the first three principal component (PC) axes, which explained more than 98% of the total spectral variation

  • We reduced data dimensionality to the first three PC axes, which explained more than 98% of the total spectral variation and calculated the spectral space occupied per community using the R package hypervolume [37] using the same settings as above

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Plants partition resources in space and time as a result of contrasting ecological strategies and evolutionary histories, giving rise to biochemical, structural or phenological differences that determine the optical properties of leaves and canopies. Other studies have shown that dissimilarity in spectral profiles of plants correlates with their functional dissimilarity [13,14,15,16,17] and evolutionary divergence time [14,15,18,19]; and positive relationships between measures of spectral diversity and ecosystem productivity [15] suggest that spectral differences among plants are coupled to resource-use complementarity. This central aspect of the optical type concept has not yet been exhaustively tested. Large spectral hypervolumes or both—will be associated with more productive ecosystems (FAB and BioDIV)

Methods
Results
Findings
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call