Abstract

AbstractFeasibility and limitations of direct coupling of high performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) separation to microwave induced plasma (MIP)-optical emission spectrometry (OES) for elementspecific detection was tested and compared to inductively coupled plasma (ICP)-optical emission spectrometric detection on the basis of the Cr(III)/Cr(VI) speciation analysis of water samples. Coupling was performed by a hydraulic high pressure nebulizer (HHPN) radiative-heating/watercooling interface which provides about 20 % and 80 % aerosol yield in the case of helium and argon carrier gases, respectively. Desolvation efficiency of aqueous solutions was approximately 80 %. Applying the ion-pair HPLC separation, the organic eluents and reagents in the MIP cause a 50–75 % signal suppression for Cr(VI) and 25–50 % for Cr(III). In a pure aqueous solution the MIP Cr(VI) signal was by 20 % lower than that of Cr(III). These effects were lower using the ICP source, but they cannot be neglected. Easily ionizable matrix elements (Na, Ca) can cause 70 % signal suppression in the MIP, and 20 % in the ICP. Therefore, species dependent calibration is required in both cases. In the case of HPLC detection by MIP-OES, the detection limit was 13 ng for Cr(III), and 18 ng for Cr(VI). Using the ICP-OES detection, the detection limit was 0.2 ng for Cr (III) and 0.4 ng for Cr (VI). The linear dynamic ranges in both cases were two orders of magnitude.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call