Abstract

PurposeCoupling interval (CI) variability of premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) is influenced by the underlying arrhythmia mechanism. The aim of this study was to compare CI variability of PVCs in different myocardial disease entities, in order to gain insight into their arrhythmia mechanism.MethodsSixty-four patients with four underlying pathologies were included: idiopathic (n = 16), non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM) (n = 16), familial cardiomyopathy (PLN/LMNA) (n = 16), and post-MI (n = 16)-associated PVCs. The post-MI group was included as a reference, on account of its known re-entry mechanism. On Holter registrations, the first 20 CIs of the dominant PVC morphology were measured manually after which median ΔCI and mean SD of CI/√R-R (= CI of PVC corrected for underlying heart rate) were obtained. Two observers independently measured PVC CIs on pre-selected Holter registrations in order to determine inter- and intra-observer reliability.ResultsThe largest ΔCI was seen in the PLN/LMNA group (220 ms (120–295)), the lowest in the idiopathic group (120 ms (100–190)). The ΔCI in the PLN/LMNA group was significantly larger than the post-MI group (220 ms (120–295) vs 130 ms (105–155), p = 0.023). Mean SD of CI/√R-R in the PLN/LMNA group was also significantly higher than in the post-MI group (p = 0.044). Inter- and intra-observer reliability was good (ICC = 0.91 vs 0.86 and 0.96 vs 0.77, respectively).ConclusionsLow ΔCI and SD of CI/√R-R of idiopathic and NIDCM PVCs suggest that the underlying arrhythmia mechanisms might be re-entry or triggered activity. Abnormal automaticity or modulated parasystole are unlikely mechanisms. High CI variability in PLN/LMNA patients suggests that the re-entry and triggered activity are less likely mechanisms in this group.

Highlights

  • Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) are common both in patients with and without structural heart disease (SHD) [1]

  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly different among the groups (p < 0.001): most patients (93.8%) in the idiopathic group had a normal LVEF and most patients (50%) in the PLN/LMNA group had severe LV dysfunction

  • To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in the literature that analyzes the Coupling interval (CI) variability of PVCs in several

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) are common both in patients with and without structural heart disease (SHD) [1]. The independent prognostic importance of the PVC burden regarding adverse cardiac events (e.g., VT, sudden cardiac death, and heart failure) has not been clarified unambiguously, symptomatic PVCs can significantly reduce the quality of life (QoL) in both patient populations, and frequent PVCs can result in tachycardiomyopathy even in the absence of overt SHD [1, 6, 7]. It is important to emphasize that the treatment of symptomatic and/or frequent PVCs can lead to a significant improvement of the QoL [6] and to the preservation/improvement of left ventricular function [7]. Incomplete understanding of the main underlying mechanisms of these arrhythmias may play a key role in this discrepancy

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.