Abstract

BackgroundHow foragers move across the landscape to search for resources and obtain energy is a central issue in ecology. Direct energetic quantification of animal movements allows for testing optimal foraging theory predictions which assumes that animals forage so as to maximise net energy gain. Thanks to biologging advances, we coupled instantaneous energy-budget models and behavioural mode analysis to test optimal foraging theory predictions on wandering albatross Diomedea exulans during the brooding period. Specifically, the instantaneous energy-budget model considered the energetic balance (i.e., the difference between empirical energy gain data and modelled energy expenditure via heart rate values) along the trajectory of a given individual. Four stereotypic instantaneous behavioural modes were identified based on trajectory properties (e.g., speed and turning angle) by applying a new algorithm called Expectation Maximization Binary Clustering. Previous studies on this species have shown that foraging-in-flight is the optimal foraging strategy during the incubation period when albatrosses undertake long-distance movements but no specific foraging strategy has been determined for shorter foraging movements (e.g., brooding period).ResultsThe output of our energy-budget model (measured as net energy gain) highlighted the potential optimality of alternative search strategies (e.g., sit-and-wait) during brooding, when birds may be subjected to specific energetic trade-offs and have to adapt their foraging strategies accordingly. However, not all birds showed this pattern, revealing the importance of considering individual variability in foraging strategies, as well as any switching among strategies, before drawing population-level generalizations. Finally, our study unveils the importance of considering fine scale activities to make realistic estimates of trip energy expenditure for flying birds at sea.ConclusionsThe up-scaling of accurately measured fine-scale energy patterns is essential to quantify energy balances, and their fluctuations by season of different activities among individuals or populations. In particular, we offer new insights for the energetic quantification of the effect of changing oceanic winds on the biology of pelagic predators in the southern oceans.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2051-3933-2-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • How foragers move across the landscape to search for resources and obtain energy is a central issue in ecology

  • The internal state governs the decision of foraging destinations. External environmental conditions such as prey availability and forcing factors constrain decision-making [3]. This outlines the importance of quantifying energetic balances to test optimal foraging theory predictions which assume that animals should forage in a way that maximises net energy gain [1]

  • Trip energy expenditure estimated via heart rate ranged on average from 4521 to 7601 kJ

Read more

Summary

Introduction

How foragers move across the landscape to search for resources and obtain energy is a central issue in ecology. Four stereotypic instantaneous behavioural modes were identified based on trajectory properties (e.g., speed and turning angle) by applying a new algorithm called Expectation Maximization Binary Clustering Previous studies on this species have shown that foraging-in-flight is the optimal foraging strategy during the incubation period when albatrosses undertake long-distance movements but no specific foraging strategy has been determined for shorter foraging movements (e.g., brooding period). External environmental conditions such as prey availability and forcing factors (e.g., wind) constrain decision-making [3] This outlines the importance of quantifying energetic balances (i.e., net energy gain–the difference between energy gain and energy expended) to test optimal foraging theory predictions which assume that animals should forage in a way that maximises net energy gain [1]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call