Abstract

Uncontrolled cell proliferation is one of the key features leading to cancer. Seminal works in chronobiology have revealed that disruption of the circadian timing system in mice, either by surgical, genetic, or environmental manipulation, increased tumor development. In humans, shift work is a risk factor for cancer. Based on these observations, the link between the circadian clock and cell cycle has become intuitive. But despite identification of molecular connections between the two processes, the influence of the clock on the dynamics of the cell cycle has never been formally observed. Recently, two studies combining single live cell imaging with computational methods have shed light on robust coupling between clock and cell cycle oscillators. We recapitulate here these novel findings and integrate them with earlier results in both healthy and cancerous cells. Moreover, we propose that the cell cycle may be synchronized or slowed down through coupling with the circadian clock, which results in reduced tumor growth. More than ever, systems biology has become instrumental to understand the dynamic interaction between the circadian clock and cell cycle, which is critical in cellular coordination and for diseases such as cancer.

Highlights

  • We propose that the cell cycle may be synchronized or slowed down through coupling with the circadian clock, which results in reduced tumor growth

  • Systems biology has become instrumental to understand the dynamic interaction between the circadian clock and cell cycle, which is critical in cellular coordination and for diseases such as cancer

  • While a study from 2004 reported that the majority of cell divisions occur in three phases of the circadian cycle [4], two more recent papers describe an absence of cell cycle regulation by the circadian clock [21, 22]

Read more

Summary

The Circadian Gating Model

Circadian rhythms and cell division are considered as non-independent processes. The circadian system controls timing of cell division both in prokaryotic and eukaryotic species. This is the case in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus and in the flagellate alga Euglena gracilis, where the molecular clock operates as a “gating” and only allows cell division at specific circadian phases [18,19,20]. It was tempting to extrapolate this phenomenon to other organisms; some research was conducted toward demonstration of circadian gating of the cell cycle in mammalian cells, results led to controversial evidence. While a study from 2004 reported that the majority of cell divisions occur in three phases of the circadian cycle [4], two more recent papers describe an absence of cell cycle regulation by the circadian clock [21, 22]

Dynamical Coupling Between Clock and Cell Cycle
Molecular Coupling Between Clock and Cell Cycle
Cellular Consequences of Coupling in Healthy Cells
Circadian Disruption and Cell Cycle Deregulation
Cell Cycle Deregulation and Cancer Lead to Circadian Disruption
Findings
Conclusion and Perspectives
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call