Abstract
Abstract. Urban groundwater management requires complex environmental models to represent interactions between hydrogeological processes and infrastructure systems. While the impacts of external uncertainties, such as climate and population growth, have been widely studied, there is limited understanding of how decision support is altered by endogenous uncertainties arising from model parameters and observations used for calibration. This study investigates (1) the importance of observation choice and parameter values on aquifer management objectives when controlling for model error and (2) how the relative performance of management alternatives varies when exposed to endogenous uncertainties, both individually and in combination. We use a spatially distributed groundwater model of the Valley of Mexico, where aquifer management alternatives include demand management, targeted infiltration, and wastewater reuse. The effects of uncertainty are evaluated using global sensitivity analysis, performance ranking of alternatives under a range of human–natural parameters, and identification of behavioral parameter sets filtered with an error metric calculated from varying subsets of observations. Results show that the parameters governing hydraulic conductivity and total water use in the basin have the greatest effect on management objectives. Error metrics (i.e., squared residuals of piezometric head) are not necessarily controlled by the same parameters as the head-based objectives needed for decision-making. Additionally, observational and parameter uncertainty each play a larger role in objective variation than the management alternatives themselves. Finally, coupled endogenous uncertainties have amplifying effects on decision-making, leading to larger variations in the ranking of management alternatives than each on their own. This study highlights how the uncertain parameters of a physically based model and their interactions with uncertain observations can affect water supply planning decisions in densely populated urban areas.
Highlights
Groundwater resource planning and management requires increasingly complex models to represent interactions between hydrogeological and infrastructure systems to achieve sustainability (Megdal et al, 2015; Singh, 2014; Wada et al, 2017; Peters-Lidard et al, 2017)
When combined with high values for flux parameters such as the total water use (TWU; governing groundwater pumping) and recharge (RCH), this could signal that these models avoid extreme mounding or drawdown that would increase model error
We explore how observation and parameter uncertainty propagate through a hydrogeologic model to influence the ranking of decision alternatives
Summary
Groundwater resource planning and management requires increasingly complex models to represent interactions between hydrogeological and infrastructure systems to achieve sustainability (Megdal et al, 2015; Singh, 2014; Wada et al, 2017; Peters-Lidard et al, 2017). The endogenous uncertainties arising from physically based hydrologic and hydrogeologic models are often neglected in infrastructure planning studies, despite often influencing predictions as much or more than external drivers (Mendoza et al, 2016; Qiu et al, 2019; Herman et al, 2020). The effects of endogenous model uncertainties on model error may be different from their effects on the ranking of alternatives and, on decision making. This difference has been largely understudied and is the focus of this paper
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
