Abstract

The U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS’s) Hospital Compare (HC) data provides a collection of risk-adjusted hospital performance metrics intended to allow comparison of hospital-provided care. However, CMS does not adjust for socioeconomic status (SES) factors, which have been found to be associated with disparate health outcomes. Associations between county-level SES factors and CMS’s risk-adjusted 30-day acute myocardial infarction (AMI) mortality rates are explored for n = 2462 hospitals using a variety of sources for county-level SES information. Upon performing multiple imputation, a stepwise backward elimination model selection approach using Akaike’s information criteria was used to identify the optimal model. The resulting model, comprised of 14 predictors mostly at the county level, provides an additional 8% explanatory power to capture the variability in 30-day risk-standardized AMI mortality rates, which already account for patient-level clinical differences. SES factors may be an important feature for inclusion in future risk-adjustment models, which will have system and policy implications for distributing resources to hospitals, such as reimbursements. It also serves as a stepping stone to identify and address long-standing SES-related inequities.

Highlights

  • Social determinants of health consist of the circumstances, settings, and environments in which people are born, develop, play, learn, live, and work [1]

  • We focused on Akaike information criterion (AIC)-based model selection since the primary research question is whether county-level socioeconomic status (SES) information is relevant to explain the variability in the 30-day risk-standardized acute myocardial infarction (AMI) mortality metric, rather than variable selection

  • Counties with larger retirement communities were associated with worse 30-day risk-standardized AMI mortality, even as this metric already accounts for age differentials at the patient level

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Social determinants of health consist of the circumstances, settings, and environments in which people are born, develop, play, learn, live, and work [1]. Examples of these determinants include socioeconomic status (SES), education, physical living environment, and access to healthcare. Healthy People 2020 and, more recently, Healthy People 2030 highlight the relevance of social determinants of health with objectives that focus on multiple such determinants, including health care access and quality [2]. Social determinants of health are addressed in a global setting by the World. Organizations, communities, and private institutions can all play a role in addressing inequities stemming from social determinants of health [5,6]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call