Abstract

This article concerns feminist engagements with epistemologies. Feminist epistemologies have revealed and challenged the exclusions and denigrations at work in knowledge production processes. And yet, the emphasis on the partiality of knowledge and the non-innocence of any subject position also cast doubt on the possibility of feminist political communities. In view of this, it has been argued that the very parameter of epistemology poses limitations for feminism, for it leads to either political paralysis or prescriptive politics that in fact undoes the political of politics. From a different perspective, decolonial feminists argue for radical epistemic disobedience and delinking the move beyond the confines of Western systems of knowledge and its extractive knowledge economy. Nevertheless, the oppositional logic informs both feminist epistemologies and its critiques, which I argue is symptomatic of the epistemic habits of academic feminism. This article ends with a preliminary reconsideration of the question of origin through the figure of zero. It asks whether it might be possible to conceive of feminist epistemologies as performing the task of counting zero – accounting for origin, wholeness, and universality – that takes into account specificities without forfeiting coalition and claims to knowledge.

Highlights

  • A specific, yet familiar scene took place at the 11th Annual Feminist Theory Workshop held at Duke University in March 2017

  • In her keynote titled Down with Love: Feminist Critique and the New Ideologies of Work, Kathi Weeks elaborated on the ways in which love has become the mechanism – a new mode of appropriation – that functions to reproduce the figure of the normative worker

  • Liu / Counting Zero: Rethinking Feminist Epistemologies work-life self-help literature, who was capable of self-regulation, understood as a form of intimate investment in work

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

A specific, yet familiar scene took place at the 11th Annual Feminist Theory Workshop held at Duke University in March 2017. As Linda Zerilli observes, ‘since a total (feminist) theory cannot exist, we are led to abandon the theoretical enterprise if not the feminist project itself’ (2005: 36) This article concerns these conundrums in feminist critical practices. Rather than repeating the logic of presence and absence, inclusion and exclusion, it zooms in on questions of origin, essence and difference in feminist epistemologies. My aim here is not to provide a comprehensive review of all the theorists’ work mentioned here Rather, it concerns the how of oppositional logical of critique, which as I will show, is key to reconsider feminist epistemologies

FEMINIST EPISTEMOLOGIES
THE PROBLEM OF EPISTEMOLOGY
COUNTING ZERO
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call