Abstract
This article critically appraises the implications of the recent emergence of radicalisation cases in the family courts of England and Wales and the involvement of the family justice system in preventing and countering terrorism. It identifies, and takes issue with, a dominant narrative found in case‐law, practitioner commentaries, think‐tank reports and academic and government literature, which regards the radicalisation cases as a positive legal development. Challenging its characterisation of this line of cases as ordinary family law cases, the article uncovers the significant influence of the logic, priorities and goals of counter‐terrorism policy and practice on the family courts. After demonstrating that the radicalisation cases have facilitated the extensive, if surreptitious, involvement of the family courts in the counter‐terrorist endeavour, the article claims that the expansion of counter‐terrorism into the family justice system is an unnecessary and dangerous legal development with worrying implications for human rights, equality and open justice.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
