Abstract
In his recent A Spirit of Trust, Robert Brandom interprets Hegel as proposing a conception of normativity that overcomes the shortcomings of both modernity and its critics. Brandom?s Hegel asks for a ?hermeneutics of magnanimity?, in opposition to what Paul Ricoeur labelled the ?hermeneutics of suspicion?. According to Brandom, ?great unmaskers? of modern normativity like Nietzsche or Foucault make use of the delegitimizing force that characterizes genealogical explanation. Their suspicion is that what is thought to be normative is conditioned by contingencies that undermine that very normativity. In this paper, while raising objections against Brandom?s reading, I want to hold on to his idea that Hegelian philosophy counters those subversive postmodern genealogies. Instead of focusing, as Brandom does, on the end of the ?Spirit? chapter in Hegel?s Phenomenology, I draw on Hegel?s logic of self-determination. Contrary to the ?great unmaskers?, for Hegel, explanation of something through reference to some external or contingent factor is parasitic on explanation that explains something through itself.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.