Abstract
Drawing upon the thought of Timothy Leary, the purpose of this article is to examine the uncomfortable relationship between his conceptualisation of ‘counterculture’ as the perpetual generation of the new, and the processes of accumulation that drive post-industrial capitalism - the very system that this account of counterculture seeks to undermine. The argument, in short, is that the countercultural, as defined by Leary, plays an essential role in the accumulation of capital that drives our economic system, and accordingly, it cannot be plausibly understood as external to the structural conditions that it opposes. This is not to suggest that counterculture does not produce new possibilities, new opportunities, and new ways of living, but instead to illustrate the contradictions that might emerge when the notion of counterculture as resistance to capitalist hegemony is coupled with the identification of counterculture as an authentic repetition of the new.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
