Abstract
In a case concerning the production of an allegedly infringing chair, the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York decided to dismiss the plaintiff's dilution and trade dress claims. As to the dilution claim, the Court reached its decision based primarily on the lack of evidence presented. As pertains to the plaintiff's trade dress claim, the Court again reasoned that the plaintiff had not stated its complaint with sufficient particularity. Simply attaching a picture of the trademarked chair and the allegedly infringing chair, as the plaintiff in this case did, was not sufficient.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
