Counsel Financial Services, LLC v. Melkersen Law, P.C., No. 08-CV-156A, 2009 WL 453379 (W.D.N.Y. Feb 23, 2009)

Abstract

Gaming Law Review and EconomicsVol. 13, No. 3 CASESCounsel Financial Services, LLC v. Melkersen Law, P.C., No. 08-CV-156A, 2009 WL 453379 (W.D.N.Y. Feb 23, 2009)Published Online:30 Jun 2009https://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2009.13311AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byThe Americans with Disabilities Act and the Constitution of the United States (Dissertation)SSRN Electronic JournalDisrupting Frivolous DefensesSSRN Electronic Journal, Vol. 276Quoting Epithets in the Classroom and BeyondSSRN Electronic JournalCompelled Decryption and the Right Against Self-Incrimination: Obsta PrincipiisSSRN Electronic Journal, Vol. 5The Myth of Personal Liability: Who Pays When Bivens Claims SucceedSSRN Electronic JournalMandatory Arbitration and the Market for ReputationSSRN Electronic JournalBoilerplate and Party IntentSSRN Electronic JournalTort Liability for Standards Development in the United States and the European UnionSSRN Electronic JournalInformed Consent: No Longer Just What the Doctor Ordered? RevisitedSSRN Electronic JournalRecent Developments in Patent Law (Spring 2017)SSRN Electronic Journal, Vol. 1314The Federal Circuit's Efforts to Save Interactive Technology PatentsSSRN Electronic JournalZnnmkoprrvnn ochrana hashtagg na sociilnnch ssttch (Trademark Protection of Hashtags on Social Media)SSRN Electronic JournalIs a FRAND Royalty a Point or a Range?SSRN Electronic JournalDetermining the Number of Occurrences and Its Impact on CoverageSSRN Electronic Journal, Vol. 280Structural Subjugation: Theorizing Racialized Sexual Harassment in HousingSSRN Electronic Journal, Vol. 14Disruptions' Function: A Defense of (Some) Form Objections under the Federal Rules of Civil ProcedureSSRN Electronic JournalJoinder of Unrelated Infringers As Defendants in Patent Litigation Under the Jurisprudence of the United States District Court for Eastern District of Texas A Critical ReviewSSRN Electronic JournalOngoing Royalties for Patent InfringementSSRN Electronic JournalPermanent Injunctions in Patent Litigation After eBay: An Empirical StudySSRN Electronic Journal, Vol. 13The PBGC Wins a Case When the Debtor Keeps its Pension PlanSSRN Electronic JournalEnforcing the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP)SSRN Electronic JournalConsent, User Reliance, and Fair UseSSRN Electronic JournalThe Case Against Federalizing Trade SecrecySSRN Electronic JournalDubious Patent ReformSSRN Electronic Journal, Vol. 810Policing the Cease-and-Desist LetterSSRN Electronic JournalDefining the Borders of Uniform International Contract Law: The CISG and Remedies for Innocent, Negligent or Fraudulent MisrepresentationSSRN Electronic JournalFTC v. LabMD: FTC Jurisdiction Over Information Privacy Is 'Plausible,' but How Far Can It Go?SSRN Electronic JournalThe Central Rationale for Trademark Protection Is and Ought to Be the Need of Businesses to Protect their Brand Value Rather than the Public InterestSSRN Electronic JournalTechnology's Triple Threat to the Attorney-Client PrivilegeSSRN Electronic JournalMessy Mental Markers: Inferring Scienter from Core Operations in Securities Fraud LitigationSSRN Electronic JournalDisabilityqueer: Federal Disability Rights Protection for Transgender PeopleSSRN Electronic JournalCleaning ElectionsSSRN Electronic JournalThe Hierarchy That Wasn’t There: Elevating ‘Usage’ to Its Rightful Position for Contracts Governed by the CISGSSRN Electronic JournalLawyers Acting Badly, or Not? Misconduct in IP Litigation: Recent Examples and the Issues They RaiseSSRN Electronic JournalIqbal 'Plausibility' in Pharmaceutical and Medical Device LitigationSSRN Electronic JournalClimate ExceptionalismSSRN Electronic JournalThe Brand X Liberation: Doing Away with Chevron’s Second Step as Well as Other Doctrines of DeferenceSSRN Electronic Journal Volume 13Issue 3Jun 2009 Information© 2009 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:Counsel Financial Services, LLC v. Melkersen Law, P.C., No. 08-CV-156A, 2009 WL 453379 (W.D.N.Y. Feb 23, 2009).Gaming Law Review and Economics.Jun 2009.256-259.http://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2009.13311Published in Volume: 13 Issue 3: June 30, 2009PDF download