Abstract

In the subduction zone, megathrust earthquakes may modulate the shallow crustal seismicity in the overriding plate. Historical documents indicate the frequent occurrence of large shallow crustal earthquakes in the overriding continental plate 50 years before and 10 years after the megathrust earthquakes along the Nankai trough in southwest Japan. In this study, we model megathrust earthquake cycles in a simple oblique subduction zone considering the viscoelasticity, and calculate the temporal evolution of the Coulomb failure stress changes (Delta {text{CFS}}) on the crustal faults in the overriding plate. Further, we examine the variation of Delta {text{CFS}} depending on the location and fault type, and the active period of crustal earthquakes in which Delta {text{CFS}} exceeds the previous maximum. Our viscoelastic model suggests that the dependency of the active period on the distance from the megathrust fault is less when the intrinsic loading rate of the inland fault is low. Moreover, it suggests that the viscoelastic stress evolution on faults with negative coseismic Delta {text{CFS}} renders the active period longer or shorter than those in a pure elastic medium. The temporal evolution of Delta {text{CFS}} on most major active faults in southwest Japan can be categorized into two groups with the following different characteristics: one is that Delta {text{CFS}} is positive coseismically and peaks 10 years after a megathrust earthquake. The other is that Delta {text{CFS}} is negative coseismically, and does not recover to the preseismic one for more than 50 years after a megathrust earthquake. This can explain the temporal sequence of the historical earthquakes in southwest Japan. Our model which includes viscoelastic relaxation successfully expresses the activation of shallow crustal earthquakes in the overriding continental plate not only before the megathrust earthquake, but also after. If the apparent frictional coefficient is less than ~ 0.1, the coseismic Delta {text{CFS}} on the source faults of the 1943 Mj7.3 Tottori earthquake, 1596 M7.0 Keicho Iyo earthquake, and 1596 M7.5 Keicho Fushimi earthquake that occurred within 10 years before the megathrust earthquake along the Nankai trough is negative. Therefore, to explain the occurrence of these historical earthquakes, our model suggests that the apparent frictional coefficient must be less than ~ 0.1.

Highlights

  • Megathrust earthquake cycles in the subduction zone can modulate the shallow crustal seismic activity in the overriding continental plate through quasi-static stress changes

  • It is notable that a larger value of μ′ generally increases Coulomb failure stress changes (CFS) because the coseismic-normal-stress change is positive with wider range of strikes and dips (Fig. 2b)

  • We investigated the influence of megathrust earthquake cycles on inland faults in the oblique subduction zone using the temporal evolution of CFS considering the viscoelasticity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Megathrust earthquake cycles in the subduction zone can modulate the shallow crustal seismic activity in the overriding continental plate through quasi-static stress changes. Previous studies (e.g., Ustu 1974; Hori and Oike 1996) indicate the frequent occurrence of shallow crustal earthquakes in the overriding continental plate (hereafter, inland earthquakes) 50 years before and 10 years after the great megathrust earthquakes along the Nankai trough (Fig. 1). Many previous studies have quantitatively evaluated the effect of megathrust earthquakes on the occurrence of inland earthquakes (e.g., Pollitz and Sacks 1997; Hori and Oike 1999; Shikakura et al 2014). Hori and Oike (1999) applied the elastic response function for calculating CFS on the crustal fault by megathrust earthquakes, and numerous studies applied the viscoelastic response function (e.g., Pollitz and Sacks 1997; Shikakura et al 2014). Shikakura et al (2014) succeeded in explaining most of the inland earthquakes in the Kinki region, incorporating the interaction between inland earthquakes, using the viscoelastic function

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call