Abstract

To sustainably exploit a population, it is crucial to understand and reduce uncertainties about population processes and effects of harvest. In migratory species, management is challenged by geographically separated changing environmental conditions, which may cause unexpected changes in species distribution and harvest. We describe the development in the harvest of Svalbard-breeding pink-footed geese (Anser brachyrhynchus) in relation to the observed trajectory and migratory behaviour of the population. In autumn, geese migrate via stopover sites in Norway and Denmark (where they are hunted) to wintering grounds in the Netherlands and Belgium (where they are protected). In Denmark and Norway harvesting increased stepwise during the 2000s. The increase in the population size only partly explained the change. The change corresponded to a simultaneous stepwise increase in numbers of geese staging in Denmark throughout autumn and winter; geese also moved further inland to feed which collectively increased their exposure to hunting. In Norway the increase in harvest reflected greater utilisation of lowland farmland areas by geese, increasing their hunting exposure. The study demonstrates how changes in migratory behaviour can abruptly affect exposure to hunting, which showed a functional response to increased temporal and spatial availability of geese. The harvest has now reached a level likely to cause a population decline. It highlights the need for flexible, internationally coordinated hunting regulations and reliable up-to-date population estimates and hunting bag statistics, which are rare in European management of migratory waterbirds. Without such information decisions are left with judgments based on population estimates, which often have time lags of several years between recording and reporting, hampering possibilities for the timely adjustment of management actions.

Highlights

  • Estimates of population size and levels of exploitation are basic requirements for managing the harvest of wildlife populations [1]

  • In mid Norway, goose numbers increased as well; counts are not available to make a detailed analysis of the shape of these increments, while hunting bags showed a stepwise increase starting in the mid-2000s, coinciding with large autumn-staging concentrations observed in certain areas

  • Recent demographic simulations suggest that in the pinkfoot population harvest mortality is additive to natural mortality and, if the current level of harvest is maintained, the population is likely to decrease because the harvest rate is increasing and exceeding the annual rate of productivity [45,46]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Estimates of population size and levels of exploitation are basic requirements for managing the harvest of wildlife populations [1]. Depending on the life-history and social structure of the species in question, harvesting techniques and motivations for harvesting (livelihood, commercial or sport) can affect size/age classes and sexes differently [7,8,9]. For migratory populations, such as waterbirds, climate change or land use change may rapidly alter the distribution or the migratory phenology of a given population [14,15]. This change, in turn, may affect its exposure to hunting, if this is unevenly distributed across the range

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call