Abstract
Although virtual non-contrast (VNC) successfully removes iodinated contrast, uncertainty exists regarding the feasibility of VNC to suppress iodine for detecting thyroid calcification. Therefore, we evaluated whether both intrinsic and extrinsic iodine attenuation were suppressed on VNC images. We enrolled 128 patients (male: female 17:111; age 48.0 ± 10.4years) who underwent dual-layer dual-energy CT (DL-DECT) examination before their thyroid cancer surgeries. Two additional sets of VNC (VNCu, VNCc) images were retrospectively generated from their true unenhanced (TUE) and true contrast-enhanced (TCE) series. We compared CT attenuation values measured on the VNCu and VNCc images by drawing identical regions of interest encompassing thyroid parenchyma, then subjectively determined the concordance of calcification. Although CT attenuation discrepancies between the VNCu and VNCc were significant (2.0 ± 5.7HU, p < 0.001),61.7%, 89.1%, and 100.0% of all measurements were < 5HU, < 10HU, and < 15HU. Based on Bland-Altman analysis, the limits of agreement were - 9.2HU and 13.2HU, whereas the proportional differences were small for VNC images generated from both TUE and TCE images. There was no discordance between two VNC image sets in detecting thyroid calcification. VNC technique could be a feasible method to suppress both intrinsic and extrinsically administered iodine for detecting thyroid calcification.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
