Abstract
BackgroundImaging techniques have proven valuable in forensic pathology practice, with computed tomography being preferred for forensic use. In the era of virtual autopsy and a low- to middle-income, resource-constrained country, a question arises as to whether ante-mortem computed tomography (ACT) could be cost-effective by reducing the number of invasive autopsies performed.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to assess the usefulness of ACT in forensic pathology by examining discrepancy rates between ACT scans and autopsy findings in cases of deceased individuals with traumatic intracranial haemorrhages and assess factors associated with discrepancies.MethodsEighty-five cases of ACT and autopsy reports from 01 January 2014 to 31 December 2016 from the Polokwane Forensic Pathology Laboratory, South Africa, were analysed retrospectively. Using Cohen’s kappa statistics, measures of agreement and resultant discrepancy rates were determined. Also, the discrepancy patterns for each identified factor was also analysed.ResultsThe discrepancy rate between ACT and autopsy detection of haemorrhage was 24.71% while diagnostic categorisation of haemorrhage was 55.3%. Classification discrepancy was most observed in subarachnoid haemorrhages and least observed in extradural haemorrhages. A markedly reduced level of consciousness, hospital stay beyond two weeks and three or fewer years of doctors’ experience contributed to classification discrepancies.ConclusionAnte-mortem computed tomography should be used only as an adjunct to autopsy findings. However, the low discrepancy rate seen for extradural haemorrhages implies that ACT may be useful in the forensic diagnosis of extradural haemorrhages.
Highlights
Imaging techniques have in recent years been found to be greatly useful in forensic pathology.[1,2] These modalities serve to augment but lower the invasive autopsies performed.[3]
The analysis revealed that most discrepant intracranial haemorrhage diagnoses (5 out of 8 cases for extradural haemorrhage (EDH); 15 out of 22 cases for subdural haemorrhage (SDH); 19 out of 29 cases for subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH)) were seen in patients with markedly low levels of consciousness, denoting severe traumatic head injury (Figure 1)
The current study found a significant difference in haemorrhage detection between ante-mortem computed tomography (ACT) and autopsy
Summary
Imaging techniques have in recent years been found to be greatly useful in forensic pathology.[1,2] These modalities serve to augment but lower the invasive autopsies performed.[3] The latter is convenient for various reasons, including religious and economic reasons. Computed tomography (CT) has been used as the preferred imaging modality in forensic imaging.[4] Though in the era of virtual autopsies, the usefulness of ante-mortem computed tomography (ACT) compared to the inexpensive invasive autopsy in a middle-income country, such as South Africa, must be justified. In the era of virtual autopsy and a low- to middle-income, resource-constrained country, a question arises as to whether antemortem computed tomography (ACT) could be cost-effective by reducing the number of invasive autopsies performed
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
