Abstract

Nurse-led primary care is a relatively rare model for primary care, but given nurses more holistic approach to medicine, can prove effective in both reducing costs and disparities in access and outcomes. The present study compares cost adjusted quality of care between a nurse-led primary care facility and the standard primary care. To compare the cost adjusted quality of care between the standard primary care model and a nurse led primary care model the outcomes from a population of patients that visited each (control and experimental, respectively) are compared with respect to three complications of hypertension (stroke, heart attack, and coronary heart disease). The number of three complications (stroke, heart attack, and coronary artery disease) from hypertension for the experimental population is estimated using time-to-event distributions estimated from the control population. Costs are estimated using the control population data. It is found that the population that visited the nurse-led primary care facility had better cost adjusted outcomes than the population that visited the physician led facilities. We can attribute, at least, $3.7 million in costs not realized due to the quality of care provided by the nursing center. Nurse-led primary care is one way that the U.S. healthcare system could reduce costs while providing consistent quality of care.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call