Abstract

Helobdella papillornata, an Australian freshwater leech, feeds primarily on snails and has a high level of parental care involving brooding eggs and young, with direct feeding of young. Parental costs and offspring benefits from these behaviours are poorly understood. A potential cost of parental care may be a change in the time taken to hunt prey. To test this hypothesis, the hunting behaviour of adults without progeny, parents with eggs, and parents with young were compared. We found that parents brooding eggs had a significantly (P = 0.029) longer lag time to begin hunting than parents brooding young, and spent significantly (P = 0.018) less time actively hunting than non-brooding adults. These costs, which may represent lost potential for the parent’s future reproductive success, should be outweighed by the fitness benefits of improved growth and survival of offspring, if parental care is favoured by selection. The hunting costs of care in Helobdella and other benthic, dorsoventrally flattened leeches in the family Glossiphoniidae may be smaller than the costs of brood tending that would be imposed on other freshwater leeches, and this difference may help explain the restriction of care to a single clade of the Euhirudinea.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call